Letter
By : Group 3
1. Abie Galih Karli
2. Eko Ari Sunarwanto
3. Gayuh Wicaksono
4. Hariyo Kusumo Jaya Mukti
5. Jessy Chaleda Salman
6. Syarifah Hidayah
1. Writing letter of
business for civil engineering
2. Writing proposal about
civil engineering business
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Design services for the redevelopment of a vacant building
totaling 70,000 square feet into a medical office facility.
BACKGROUND
The intent of this RFP is to have the firms under consideration
specifically address the services required and provide a well-considered price
proposal for those services.
The owner is looking for a "turnkey" approach,
where the architecture firm will provide the following (not listed in order of
preference):
1. A conceptual plan for the building, incorporating the
latest thinking in the field concerning office requirements.
2. Recommendations relative to the installation of different
building systems (e.g., heat pumps vs. VAV).
3. Specific conceptual drawings and detailed engineering and
construction drawings that will serve as the basis for both bidding and
construction by a general contractor.
4. Help with selection of construction firms that should be
given an opportunity to bid on the project based on their reputation for
quality, their experience (previous medical projects are given specific
attention), their reputation for on-time and on-budget performance, and their
financial credibility.
5. Preparation of necessary bid documents to be sent to construction
firms for the project.
6. Review of the bids received to assess the relative merits
of each and assist the owner in awarding the contract, as well as in preparing
(from a business perspective) an appropriate contract (owner will have legal representation)
if standard AIA Contract Documents are not used.
7. Preparation of certain marketing materials for a
pre-leasing and post-completion leasing effort (e.g., renderings, both interior
and exterior).
8. Develop a standard fit-out package for tenants and a
budget for each tenant, with pricing for custom add-ons and the standard
fit-out.
9. Regular site observations of the contractor and
subcontractors during the construction phase, and sign off on construction
drawings to assure that scheduled payments are made, with appropriate
holdbacks, when predetermined work has been completed.
10. Assistance, where necessary, with the government
approval process (i.e., permits).
11. Final sign-off on the project, assuring that the final
project represents what was originally conceptualized and captured in the
working drawings.
12. Some work on the building has already been done,
including a complete upgrade of the elevators and the lobby. In process is a
complete renovation of the roof. These items are excluded from the RFP.
13. This project is expected to be completed by
_____________.
14. The existing facility will be available for inspection
between the dates of _______ and _________. Please call to make an appointment.
As this proposal covers new construction and renovations and
additions to an existing building, please answer the questions providing
information to support new construction, additions, and renovations.
1. Provide the following information:
a. Name of firm
b. Complete address
c. Contact person
d. Telephone number
e. Fax number
f. Internet address
g. E-mail address
2. Provide a General Statement of Qualifications that
responds to the project background information given above.
3. Personnel
a. List the professional and support positions and number of
personnel in each position.
b. Provide an organizational chart, including resumes of all
personnel who would be committed to this project. Provide specific information
as to their experience on projects similar to this one. For the project manager
and project architects identified as part of the project team, provide the name
and phone number of two (three, four, your call) clients with whom the
architect has worked on a similar building project.
c. List professional consultants outside your firm whom you
propose would provide services not available in your firm. Provide specific
information documenting their work on similar projects.
4. Medical Office Facilities
a. Submit a list of all health care-related projects your
firm currently has in progress and the status of each.
b. For your last five health care projects, provide the
following:
1) Name of project
2) Client contact
3) Owner’s total initial budget
4) Total project cost
i. Number of change orders
ii. Total cost of change orders
5) Date of bid
6) Scheduled completion date
7) Actual completion date
c. List your three best projects and the project personnel,
including consultants, for those projects.
d. Describe the exceptional features of health care
facilities designed by your firm.
e. Explain your firm’s medical technology expertise.
5. Special Design Concerns
a. Explain how your firm ensures compliance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Provide examples.
b. Efficient energy usage is a concern of the corporation.
Describe how your firm incorporates this aspect of design into its work.
Provide examples.
6. Architectural/Engineering Service
a. Provide information on your current workload and how you
would accommodate this project.
b. Describe in detail the process you would follow from
schematic approval through approval of the final design.
c. Outline the design schedule you would implement to meet
the expected construction and occupancy dates. Describe the methods you would
use to maintain this schedule.
d. Describe your method for consensus building, including
your role, the methodology employed, the outcome, and a contact person for a
recent project where you employed this method.
e. Describe the types of problems you have encountered on
similar projects, and explain what you did to resolve the problems and what you
would do differently to avoid such problems on future projects.
f. Describe how your firm can add value to this project and
the process and include examples of situations from comparable projects where
the owner realized tangible value.
7. Construction Costs
a. Describe cost control methods you use and how you
establish cost estimates. Include information on determining costs associated
with construction in existing facilities.
b. List the steps in your standard change order procedure.
8. Legal Concerns
a. Explain the circumstances and outcome of any litigation,
arbitration, or claims filed against your company by a health care client or
any of the same you have filed against a health care client.
b. Explain the circumstances and outcome of any litigation,
arbitration, or claims filed against your company by any client other than a
health care client or any of the same you have filed.
c. Explain your General Liability Insurance coverage.
d. Explain your Professional Liability Insurance coverage.
9. Fees
a. Provide information on your preliminary fee structure
based on the scope indicated above, including anticipated reimbursable costs.
b. Submit a schedule of hourly rates by employee
classification, including terms and rates of overtime for additional work if
requested.
RESOURCES
For More Information on This Topic
See also “Project Delivery Options,” by Philip G. Bernstein,
FAIA, The Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice, 13th edition,
Chapter 10, page 257. The Handbook can be ordered from the AIA Bookstore
by calling 800-242-3837 (option 4), by sending an e-mail to bookstore@aia.org,
or by visiting www.aia.org/books.
More Best Practices
The following AIA Best Practices provide additional
information related to this topic:
03.02.02 Sample Request for Qualifications Format
05.02.01 Educating the Client
05.03.01 Qualifications-Based vs. Low-Bid Contractor
Selection
Feedback
The AIA welcomes member feedback on Best Practice articles.
To provide feedback on this article, please contact bestpractices@aia.org.
Key Terms
• Practice
• Marketing
• Marketing plans
• Request for prop
3. Memo writing about civil
engineering business
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
441 G STREET, NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20314-1000
MEMORANDUM FOR MAJOR SUBORDINATE COMMANDS
SUBJECT: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil
Works Review
Board (CWRB)
Expectations
and Guidelines
1. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's Planning
Program must be managed in an organized and
coherent fashion, in accordance with the
"Planning" tenet of the Corp's Planning Modernization
initiative. To fully realize the
"Program" tenet, all elements of the agency must produce clearly
supported, risk informed, high quality, policy compliant
and well written documentation,
resulting in policy and legally compliant decision
documents.
This
memorandum addresses
enterprise standards and procedures to enable
the execution of organized and predictive
management of studies through the Civil Works
Review Board (CWRB) process.
2. The Division Commander's submittal of a
final study report initiates a series of Washingtonlevel
actions, including a CWRB, which culminate in
a Chiefs Report. Following consideration
by the Administration and Congress, most Chiefs
Reports result in authorization of the
recommended project. The purpose of this
memorandum is to emphasize required standards
regarding the district commander's final
report package, the Division Commander's endorsement
of the final report package, and the
preparations for a successful CWRB.
3. Districts are responsible for developing
study documents in accordance with the procedures
and policies set forth in applicable USACE
engineering regulations and circulars. EC 1165-2-
214 mandates that all required reviews, with
the exception of the USACE policy compliance
review, be completed before the District
Commander signs the final feasibility report. By
endorsing the final report package to HQUSACE,
the MSC Commander is confirming that the
division staff has reviewed the report, it complies with
all applicable policies and laws in place at
the time of its completion and he or she
concurs with the findings and recommendations of the
District Commander. Because of the necessary
independent nature of the Divisions' quality
assurance function, the MSC review of the
final report will not be concurrent with the
HQUSACE policy review.
4. The duty of the HQUSACE policy review team
is to ensure that the final feasibility report is
ready for immediate release upon completion of
the CWRB. To accomplish this, the policy
review team is provided up to six weeks prior
to the CWRB during, which it assesses the final
report package to identify any key concerns
with the documentation, and to work with the
vertical team to resolve those concerns.
Printed
on ® Recycled Paper
SUBJECT: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil
Works Review Board (CWRB) Expectations
and Guidelines
5. As a result of multiple experiences where
delayed, incomplete, or poor quality final study
report submittal packages have compromised the
completion of a full and adequate assessment
prior to the scheduled CWRB, USACE Civil Works
Directorate will no longer calendar a
project-specific CWRB date and time until a
complete MSC Final Report Submittal Package, as
required by either Exhibit H-7 ofER 1105-2-100
or Planning Bulletin PB 2013-03-Reissue, has
been logged into the Office of Water Project
Review (OWPR). The HQUSACE Regional
Integration Team (RIT) will ensure the
adequacy of the MSC Final Report Submittal Package.
6. Once a complete MSC Final Report Submittal
Package is logged for review, a tentative
CWRB date will be identified within 60 days of
the log-in date. Enabled by higher quality final
report package submissions, the OWPR goal will
be to complete the pre-CWRB review
assessment within 30 days. In all cases, the
OWPR Team will complete its assessment and
resolution of any identified issues within 42
days of the log-in date, unless exempted by the
Director of Civil Works (DCW) due to excessive
work load.
If
issues are not resolved by the
completion of the assessment, the report will be
returned to the MSC for additional work and
revision. However, in order to ensure
organized scheduling and consistent program
management, no reviews or CWRB dates for a
project will be prioritized over previous
commitments to another project without the
approval of the Deputy Commanding General for
Civil and Emergency Operations (DCG-CEO) or
the DCW.
7. The CWRB date and time will only be
confirmed after the OWPR policy assessment is
complete and the CWRB Panel, including either
the DCG-CEO or DCW, have been pre-briefed
and concur with finalizing the schedule for
the CWRB. In all cases, the OWPR Team will brief
the DCG-CEO and DCW within 50 days of receipt
of the Final Report Submittal Package.
CWRB dates will normally be scheduled within
two to three weeks of the CWRB Panel prebrief.
The goal is that all CWRBs will be scheduled
and executed no more than 60 days
following log-in of the complete MSC Final
Report Submittal Package.
?-.,.-.;\d_";:J J~ ! -
DISTRIBUTION:
Commander:
Great Lakes and Ohio River Division, CELRD
Mississippi Valley Division, CEMVD
North Atlantic Division, CENAD
Northwestern Division, CENWD
Pacific Ocean Division, CEPOD
South Atlantic Division, CESAD
South Pacific Division, CESPD
Southwestern Division, CESWD
u ()------.,-,
JOHN W. PEABODY
Major General, USA
Deputy Commanding Gen ral
for Civil and Emergency Operations
(SAMPLE BILLING INVOICE)
COMPANY LETTERHEAD
GREAT ENGINEERS INC.
October
15, 2013
Mr. Ryan Dahlke, P.E.
Consultant
Design Engineer
Montana
Department of Transportation
P.O. Box
201001
Helena , MT 59620-1001
Professional Services INVOICE
#:
284
NH 2-10(32)0
Big Sky Country – North PROJECT
NO: 9900
CN 4089
In accordance with the agreement dated July 5, 2009, between
the State of Montana and Great Engineers, Inc.
Services
from August 31, 2010 through September 30, 2010
Total Amount of contract $131,944.00
Project Completion 98%
Total Amount Earned to Date $130,174.54
Total Amount Billed Previously
($129,737.85)
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS BILLING $436.69
Certification:
I hereby certify this claim is correct
and just in all respects and that payment or credit has not been received. I further certify all subconsultant claims
included with this claim are the result of a legally executed subconsultant
agreement that contains all the requirements of the contract between MDT and
this firm:
This claim contains no
Great Engineers, Inc. 48
CFR 31.2
For any questions regarding this invoice contact
at Tel
#
COMPANY LETTERHEAD
GREAT ENGINEERS INC.
Page: 2 of 4
Invoice No:
284
Project No: 9900
Date:
October 15, 2010
NH 2-10(32)0
Big Sky Country – North
CN 3089
This
Invoice Cumulative
LABOR $35.50 $31,510.65
OVERHEAD 145% 51.48 45,690.44
-------------- -------------
SUBTOTAL LABOR $86.98 $77,201.09
-------------- -------------
SUBCONSULTANTS (Invoices Attached)
$464.40 $40,446.59
-------------- -------------
DIRECT EXPENSE $0.00
$3,387.86
-------------- -------------
TOTAL COSTS $551.38 $121,035.54
-------------- -------------
FIXED FEE (% OF LABOR) $10.44 $9,139.00
-------------- -------------
TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE $561.82 $130,174.54
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DBE
TRACKING - PAID SINCE LAST INVOICE
DBE and Non- DBE Subconsultants
|
Date Paid
|
Amount Paid
|
COMPANY LETTERHEAD
GREAT ENGINEERS INC.
Page: 3 of 4
Invoice No: 284
Project No: 9900
Date:
October 15, 2010
NH 2-10(32)0
Big Sky Country – North
CN 3089
ENGINEERING SERVICES EMPLOYEE HOURS
RATE AMOUNT
PROJECT MANAGER Bill Jones
1.00 $24.00
$24.00
CIVIL ENGINEER II Ed Blake
0.00 22.00
0.00
CIVIL ENGINEER II Flo Smith
0.00 22.00 0.00
DESIGNER/DRAFTSMAN Rick Deeds 0.00
14.00 0.00
SECRETARY/CLERICAL Bob Able 1.00
11.50 11.50
--------
$35.50
DIRECT EXPENSE This
Invoice Cumulative
Computer (rate/hour) 0.00 0.00
Title Commitments 0.00 0.00
Federal Express & Postage 0.00 216.02
Mileage (rate/mile) 0.00 0.00
Lodging (# of nights for this invoice)
0.00 1,160.91
Photo Processing and Reproduction
0.00 975.32
Supplies for Sampling 0.00 39.07
Meals 0.00 246.80
Phone 0.00 199.74
Plan Review Fee 0.00 550.00
Itemize additional Direct Expenses as appropriate
------- -----------
TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSE $0.00
$3,387.86
COMPANY LETTERHEAD
GREAT ENGINEERS INC.
Page: 4 of 4
Invoice No: 284
Project No: 9900
Date:
October 15, 2010
NH 2-10(32)0
Big Sky Country – North
CN 3089
This SUBCONSULTANT SERVICES Invoice Cumulative
Acme Surveying (Land Surveys) 464.40 10,593.89
B&L Company (Landscape Architect) 0.00 5,369.33
Del Bowman & Co. (Mechanical & Electrical) 0.00
12,513.66
-------- ------------
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT SERVICES $464.40 $40,446.59
5. Inquiry writing about
civil engineering business
6. Curiculum vitae
Curriculum
Vitae
Chalioris
E. Constantin, Dr. Civil Engineer, Assist. Professor
Personal
data
• Family
& First name: CHALIORIS Constantin
• Place
of birth: Chios, Greece
• Date
of birth: January 29th, 1971
• Nationality:
Hellenic
• Marital
status: Married, with one child
• Home
address: 15-17, Pontion street, Xanthi 67100, Greece
• Univ.
address: Democritus University of Thrace - Civil Engineering Dept.
Structural
Engineering Division - Reinforced Concrete Lab.
12, V. Sofias
street, Xanthi 67100, Greece
E-mail:
chaliori@civil.duth.gr
Web page:
http://utopia.duth.gr/~chaliori/
Tel./fax:
+302541079632
Education
- Studies
• June
1988 Graduate of High School of Athens, Greece.
• June
1993 Diploma in Civil Engineering (5-year course), School of Engineering,
Democritus
University of Thrace, Greece.
Grade: 8.37
(84%).
Awards from
the State Scholarships Foundation (I.K.Y.) and from the Technical
Chamber of
Greece for excellences at the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th academic
year with
grades 8.53, 8.21, 8.06 and 9.43, respectively.
• Nov.
1999 Postgraduate Specialization Diploma (M.Sc.) in Structural Engineering
(oneyear
course)
entitled: “Advanced Materials and Technologies for the
Design
of
Reinforced Concrete Structures”, Department of Civil
Engineering, School
of
Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece.
Grade point
average: 9.10 (91%).
• Feb.
2000 Doctoral Diploma (Ph.D.) in Civil Engineering, Democritus University of
Thrace,
Greece. Dissertation title: “Study of the Behaviour and the
Failure
Mechanisms
of Plain and Reinforced Concrete Elements in Torsion”.
Grade: 10
(100%).
2
Academic
career
• 1994-2003
Laboratory teaching assistant and associate in research projects of Reinforced
Concrete
Laboratory, Civil Engineering Dept., Democritus University of
Thrace,
Greece.
• Dec.
2003 Lecturer in Structural Engineering Division of Civil Engineering Dept.,
School of
Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece, in the field
of: “Experimental
Research of Concrete Members”.
• Oct.
2009 Assistant Professor in Structural Engineering Division of Civil
Engineering
Dept., School
of Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece, in
the field of: “Experimental
Research of Reinforced Concrete Members”.
Teaching
and academic experience
• Teaching
in Civil Engineering Dept. of Democritus University of Thrace:
Undergraduate
courses:
- “Reinforced
Concrete IA” (7th semester – core course), since 2004
- “Prestressed
Concrete” (9th semester – compulsory course of
structural engineering option),
since 2004
- “Laboratory
Topics of Reinforced Concrete” (8th semester –
elective course), since
2004
- “Design
of Masonry Structures” (8th semester – elective course), since
2004
- “Testing
and Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Structures”
(9th semester – elective
course), since
2010
Postgraduate
course in Structural Engineering:
- “Design
of Reinforced Concrete Members” (compulsory
course), since 2004
• Supervisor
of 2 doctoral dissertations and over 30 undergraduate diploma theses and
postgraduate
dissertations
in Reinforced Concrete Lab. of Civil Engineering Dept., Democritus
University of
Thrace.
• Member
of the seven-member examination committees of 9 doctoral candidates in Civil
Engineering
Dept., Democritus University of Thrace.
• Other
related activities:
- Instructor
in seminars of Technical Chamber of Greece, Centre of Employment Opportunities
(K.E.K.) and
National Institute of Employment Opportunities (I.E.K.), since 1993.
- Lectures in
meetings organized by Technical Chamber of Greece, on subjects in the field
of EuroCode 2
and design of reinforced concrete structures, since 1996.
- Member of
the educational personnel of the Training Institute (IN.EP.) of National Centre
for Public
Administration and Local Government (E.K.D.D.A.) for the continuous train3
ing (via
seminars) of the Engineers of the public services and local government, on
subjects
in the field
of construction materials, in-situ testing, capacity assessment, repair and
strengthening
techniques of existing reinforced concrete structures, since 2003.
- Member of
the three-member examination committees of Technical Chamber of Greece
(East-Macedonian
Dept.) for examining and awarding professional licenses of civil engineers,
since 2007.
Reviewer
Reviewer in
the following refereed journals:
•
Engineering Structures
•
Advances in Engineering Software
•
Cement and Concrete Composites
•
Composite Structures
•
Steel and Composite Structures
•
Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE
•
Computers and Concrete
•
Scientific Research and Essays
•
World Applied Science Journal
and in the 7th
European Conference on Structural Dynamics (Eurodyn 2008),
Southampton,
UK, July 2008.
Research
projects
- Scientist in
charge of the postgraduate course programme of Structural Engineering Division,
Department of
Civil Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, since 2010.
- Scientist in
charge and member of teams of research programmes in Department of Civil
Engineering,
Democritus University of Thrace concerning laboratory tests of concrete
subassemblages,
seismic
assessment and in-situ testing of special buildings and pre-seismic safety
evaluation of
buildings, since 1994.
Professional
activity
- Member of
Technical Chamber of Greece since 1993.
- Designer of
buildings, special structures, capacity assessment and rehabilitation of
historic
masonry
buildings and reinforced concrete structures in Thrace, Thessaloniki,
Korinthos,
Nafplio, Argos,
Chania and Athens (as consultant engineer in construction offices and as
associate
in research
project teams).
4
Research
interests
• Design
and analysis of concrete and masonry structures
• Testing
of concrete members under static and cyclic loading
• Repair
and strengthening of concrete members and structures (resin injections,
reinforced
cast-in-place
concrete and shotcrete jacketing and Fibre-Reinforced-Polymers materials)
• In-situ
testing and capacity assessment of concrete structures
• Torsional
analysis of plain, fibre, reinforced and prestressed concrete members
• Fibre
concrete behaviour
Publications
Doctoral
dissertation
1. C.E. Chalioris, “Study of the
Behaviour and the Failure Mechanisms of Plain and Reinforced
Concrete
Elements in Torsion”, Doctoral Dissertation, Civil
Engineering Dept., School of Engineering,
Democritus University of Thrace,
Xanthi, Greece, 440 pp., 1999.
International
refereed journals
2. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris, K.K. Sideris, “Effectiveness of RC Beam-Column Connection
Repairing
using Epoxy
Resin Injections”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.
217-240, 1998.
3. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris, “Experimental Validation of a Smeared Analysis for Concrete in
Torsion”, Journal of Structural
Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 6, pp. 638-645, 2000.
4. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris, “Capacity of RC Joints Suffered Early-age Cyclic Loading”,
Journal of
Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 479-510, 2000.
5. C.G. Karayannis, C.E. Chalioris,
“Strength
of Prestressed Concrete Beams in Torsion”, Journal
Structural
Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 165-180, 2000.
6. C.E. Chalioris, “Experimental
Study of the Torsion of Reinforced Concrete Members”, Journal
Structural
Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 713-737, 2006.
7. C.E. Chalioris, “Analytical
Model for the Torsional Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams
Retrofitted
with FRP Materials”, Journal Engineering Structures, Vol. 29, No.
12, pp. 3263-
3276, 2007.
8. C.E. Chalioris, “Torsional
Strengthening of Rectangular and Flanged Beams using Carbon Fibre-
Reinforced-Polymers
– Experimental Study”, Journal Construction and Building Materials,
Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 21-29, 2008.
9. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris, G.M. Sirkelis, “Local Retrofit of Exterior RC Beam-Column
Joints using
Thin RC Jackets – An Experimental Study”, Journal Earthquake
Engineering and
Structural
Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 727-746, 2008.
10. C.E. Chalioris, M.J. Favvata,
C.G. Karayannis, “Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints with
Crossed
Inclined Bars under Cyclic Deformations”, Journal Earthquake
Engineering and
Structural
Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 881-897, 2008.
5
11. C.E. Chalioris, C.G.
Karayannis, “Effectiveness of the use of Steel Fibres on the Torsional
Behaviour
of Flanged
Concrete Beams”, Journal Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 31, No.
5,
pp. 331-341, 2009.
National
refereed journals (in Greek)
12. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris, “Torsional Behaviour of Reinforced Fibrous Concrete Elements”,
Journal “Technika
Chronika”, Scientific Journal of Technical Chamber of Greece - A,
Vol. 16, No. 1-2, pp. 53-67,
1996.
13. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris, “Repair of R/C Elements using Damaged by Seismic Excitations
using Resin Injections”, Journal
“Scientific
Review Ktirio”, Vol. C, pp. 31-38, 1998.
14. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris, “Experimental Investigation of Fiber – Concrete Behaviour in
Direct Tension”, Journal “Scientific
Review Ktirio”, Vol. A, pp. 45-54, 2000.
15. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris, “Influence of Steel-Fibers on the Capacity of Flanged Beams in
Torsion”, Journal “Technika
Chronika”, Scientific Journal of Technical Chamber of Greece - A,
Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 111-122,
2000.
International
conferences without proceedings (invited papers)
16. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris (presenter), “Smeared Crack Model for Plain Concrete in
Torsion
and
Experimental Validation”, ACI–ASCE 445, Shear and Torsion Committee, Toronto
Convention “Torsion of Structural
Concrete: Recent Advances”, Toronto, Canada, Oct. 2000.
17. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris (both presenters), “Torsion of Prestressed Concrete and Steel-
Fiber
Concrete Members”, ACI–445E Torsion of Structural Concrete Committee, Structural
Engineering Institute (SEI) of the
ASCE “Structures Congress & Exposition”, Nashville, Tennessee,
USA, May 2004.
International
refereed conferences
18. C.M. Economou, C. Prinou,
C.E. Chalioris, C.G. Karayannis, “Capacity Decrease of RC Joints
due to
Seismic Actions in the Curing Period”, Proceedings of the 11th European
Conference on
Earthquake
Engineering (ECEE), Paris, France, Proceedings in CD form, folder T2, file:
ecocdo.pdf, Sept. 1998.
19. C.E. Chalioris (presenter), “Shear
Performance of RC Beams using FRP Sheets Covering Part of
the Shear
Span”,
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Concrete Repair, St-
Malo, Brittany, France, Vol. 2,
pp. 809-816, July 2003.
20. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris (presenter), “Strengthening of Shear T-beams using Carbon
FRP”, Proceedings
of the 1st
International Conference on Concrete Repair, St-Malo, Brittany,
France, Vol. 2, pp. 775-782, July
2003.
21. C.G. Karayannis, G.M.
Sirkelis, C.E. Chalioris (presenter), “Repair of Reinforced Concrete Tbeam
– Column
Joints using Epoxy Resin Injections”, Proceedings of the 1st
International Conference
on Concrete
Repair, St-Malo, Brittany, France, Vol. 2, pp. 793-800, July 2003.
22. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris (poster presentation), “Experimental Investigation of the
Contribution
of Bonded
C-FRP jackets to Shear Capacity of RC Beams”, Proceedings of the International
Symposia
“Celebrating Concrete: People and Practice”, University of Dundee, Scotland,
UK, Vol. Role of Concrete in
Sustainable Development, pp. 689-696, Sept. 2003.
6
23. C.E. Chalioris (presenter), “Cracking and
Ultimate Torque Capacity of Reinforced Concrete
Beams”, Proceedings
of the International
Symposia “Celebrating Concrete: People and Practice”,
University of Dundee, Scotland,
UK, Vol. Role of Concrete Bridges in Sustainable Development,
pp. 109-118, Sept. 2003.
24. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris (presenter), “Cyclic Testing of RC Connections in the
Concrete
Curing
Period: Influence on the Final Capacity”, Proceedings of the International
Symposia
“Celebrating Concrete:
People and Practice”, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK, Vol. Role
of Concrete in Sustainable
Development, pp. 319-328, Sept. 2003.
25. C.G. Karayannis, C.E.
Chalioris (presenter), P.D. Mavroeidis, “Shear Capacity of RC
Rectangular
Beams with
Continuous Spiral Transversal Reinforcement”, Proceedings of the 12th
International
Conference on
Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements (CMEM
2005), Malta, pp.
379-386, June 2005.
26. C.E. Chalioris (presenter), “Behaviour
Model and Experimental Study for the Torsion of Reinforced
Concrete
Members”, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on High
Performance
Structures and
Materials (HPSM 2006), Ostend, Belgium, pp. 459-468, May 2006.
27. C.G. Karayannis, G.M.
Sirkelis, C.E. Chalioris (poster presentation), “Seismic
Performance of RC
Beam-Column
Joints Retrofitted using Light RC Jacket – Experimental Study”, Proceedings
of the
1st
International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (ECEES), Geneva,
Switzerland, Proceedings in CD
form, PN.136, Sept. 2006.
28. C.E. Chalioris, C.G.
Karayannis, M.J. Favvata, “Cyclic Testing of Reinforced Concrete Beam-
Column
Joints with Crossed Inclined Bars”, Proceedings of the 13th
International Conference
on Computational
Methods and Experimental Measurements (CMEM 2007), Prague,
Czech
Republic, pp. 623-632, July 2007.
29. C.E. Chalioris (presenter), “Tests and
Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams under Torsion Retrofitted
with FRP
Strips”, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational
Methods and
Experimental Measurements (CMEM 2007), Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 633-
642, July 2007.
30. C.E. Chalioris, “Behavioural
Model of FRP Strengthened Reinforced Concrete Beams under Torsion”,
Proceedings of the 1st Asian
Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures (APFIS 2007),
Hong Kong, Republic of China,
Vol. I, pp. 111-116, Dec. 2007.
31. C.E. Chalioris, M.J. Favvata,
C.G. Karayannis, “A New Method for the Seismic Rehabilitation of
Old Exterior
Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints”, Proceedings of the 7th European
Conference
on Structural
Dynamics (Eurodyn 2008), Southampton, UK, Proceedings in CD form,
paper number E245, July 2008.
32. V. Tsioukas, V. Alexandri,
C.G. Karayannis, C.E. Chalioris, “Photogrammetry as a Tool to Record
a Historic
Building at Risk”, Proceedings of the 22nd CIPA Symposium, Kyoto,
Japan, Oct.
2009.
33. C.E. Chalioris, E.F. Sfiri, “Shear
Performance of Steel Fibrous Concrete Beams”, Proceedings of
the 12th East
Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC-
12), Hong Kong,
Republic of China, Jan. 2011.
and 15 papers in National
conferences (13 in Greek and 2 in English)
7
Citations
88 citations
are known in books, refereed journals, research reports (in USA Institutes and
Universities),
refereed conference proceedings and dissertations (dissertations in Democritus
University of Thrace are
excluded).
7. Bibliography
Bibliography
1. Bulletin 17B, 1982, “Guidelines for
Determining Flood Flow Frequency,” Bulletin # 17B
of the Hydrology Subcommittee, March
1982, Interagency Advisory Committee on
Water Data, United States Department of
the Interior Geological Survey.
2. Clarke, K.C., 1986, “Advances in
geographic information systems, Computers,
Environment and Urban Systems, 10, pp.
175-184.
3. Chow, V.T., D.R. Maidment, and L.W.
Mays, 1988, “Applied Hydrology,” McGraw-Hill,
Inc., New York.
4. DMA, 1988, “Department of Defense
World Mapping System,” Defense Mapping Agency
Technical Report 8350.2, revised 1988.
5. Dragomir, V.C., D.N. Ghitau, M.S.
Mihailescu, M.G. Rotaru, 1982, “Theory of the Earth’s
Shape,” Developments in Solid Earth
Geophysics, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company,
Amsterdam.
6. Dunn, D., 1995, civil engineer,
United States Geological Survey, Cameron Road, Austin,
Texas.
7. ESRI, 1993, “Arc Macro Language,”
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
8. ESRI, 1995, “ArcNews,” Vol. 17, no.
2, pp. 9.
9. ESRI, 1994, “Understanding GIS - The
Arc/Info Method,” Environmental Systems
Research Institute, Inc.
10. ESRI, 1991, “Cell-Based Processing
with GRID,” user documentation, Environmental
Systems Research Institute, Inc.,
Redlands, California.
11. FGDC, 1994, “Content Standards for
Digital Geospatial Metadata,” Federal Geographic
Data Committee, June 8, 1994, c/o United
States Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
12. Jensen, S.K., 1991, “Applications of
Hydrologic Information Automatically Extracted from
Digital Elevation Models,” Hydrologic
Processes, 5(1).
13. Jensen, S.K., J.O. Domingue, 1988,
“Extracting Topographic Structure From Digital
Elevation Data For Geographic
Information System Analysis,” Photogrammetric
Engineering and Remote Sensing 54(11).
14. Jones, N.L., S.G. Wright, D.R.
Maidment, 1990, “Watershed delineation with trianglebased
terrain models. Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering 116(10).
15. Maidment, D.R., 1993, “Developing a
Spatially Distributed Unit Hydrograph by Using
GIS,” HydroGIS ‘93, proceedings of
“International Conference on Application of
Geographic Information Systems in
Hydrology and Water Resources Management,”
edited by K.Kovar and H.P. Nachtnebel,
pp. 181-192.
16. Maidment, D.R., 1993, “GIS and
Hydrologic Modeling,” in “Environmental Modeling
with GIS”, edited by M.F. Goodchild.
17. Maidment, D.R., 1994, Professor of
Civil Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
18. Mizgalewicz, P., 1994, Graduate
Student, University of Texas.
19. NRC, 1973, “Minutes of the 60th
Meeting,” Associate Committee on Geodesy and
Geophysics, National Research Council of
Canada, Ottawa.
20. Olivera, F., 1994, Graduate Student,
University of Texas.
21. Ragan, R.M., 1991, “A Geographic
Information System to Support State-wide Hydrologic
and Nonpoint Pollutant Modeling, “
Department of Civil Engineering, University of
Maryland.


Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar